TRADEMARK GUDANG GARAM VERSUS GUDANG BARU

Authors

  • Angga Saputra IAI Al-Khairat Pamekasan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61397/ays.v1i1.7

Keywords:

Brand dispute, salt cellar, gudang baru

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the issue of trademark rights disputes between Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru regarding the name and logo of a painting or picture. The dispute is related to the brand name and the painting displayed on the New Warehouse product. The approach used in this study is qualitative, with case studies being the method used by researchers. The things that will be examined in this research are related to the trademark dispute rights regulation between Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru and both the content and legal considerations of the judges in the trademark dispute rights case between Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru. Researchers in this study will specifically examine the issue of trademark rights between Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru. This study employs normative legal methods and data collection, as well as a literary or conceptual approach. This research on analyzing research data was carried out using the case study method. The results of the study stated that the New Warehouse had violated the provisions regarding trademark registration in accordance with Article 1 Paragraph (1) of the Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications N 20 of 2016 and Article 18 Paragraph (3) of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. 67 of 2016 concerning Trademark Registration related to the brand name and the Gudang Garam painting, which is referred to as a well-known brand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Betlehn, A., & Samosir, PO (2018). EFFORTS FOR LEGAL PROTECTION OF MSMEs INDUSTRY MARKS IN INDONESIA. Law and Justice , 3 (1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v3i1.6080

Denny, D., Liegestu, YP, Novika, N., & Patros, A. (2022). Trademark Dispute Resolution in Indonesia: Verdict Study. SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS , 7 (2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v7i2.377

Dewi, N., & Baskoro, T. (2019). Brand Dispute Case of Prada Sa with Pt. Manggala Putra Mighty in International Civil Law. Journal of Ius Constituendum , 4 (1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i1.1531

Elshalinge, E. (2020). Analysis of the Judge's Decision Regarding Trademark Disputes in the Registration Process [Undergradute, Darma Cendika Catholic University, Faculty of Law]. http://repositori.ukdc.ac.id/869

Hafizah, HJ, & Apriani, R. (2022). Brand Dispute Resolution (Case Study Pepsodent Strong vs Formula Strong). The Face of the Law , 6 (2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.879

Mahadewi, P., & Mh, S. (2014). JURIDICAL REVIEW OF JUDGES' DECISION ON TRADEMARK FAKE CASES. RATU ADIL , 3 (2), Art. 2. http://ejournal.unsa.ac.id/index.php/ratuadil/article/view/36

Mahdi, RO, & Ikrimah, I. (2022). Ikea Brand Dispute Settlement Process in Litigation in a Trade Law Perspective. Civilia: Journal of Law Studies and Citizenship Education , 1 (2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.572349/civilia.v1i2.140

Nasution, AGJ (2020). RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE .

Prime, K., & Pujiyono. (2017). Weaknesses of the Trademark Law in terms of Mark Registration (study on Pierre Cardn's Mark Dispute Decision). Journal of Private Law , 5 (2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v5i2.19398

Sangap C, M., Handayani, S., & Novera, A. (2018). Juridical Review of Trademark Dispute Settlement According to Law No. 20 of 2016 Concerning Brands (Decision study No. 92 K/Pdt.sus-Hki/2017) [Undergraduate, Sriwijaya University]. https://repository.unsri.ac.id/1274/

Simatupang, P., & Dermoredjo, SK (2003). Gross Domestic Production, Prices and Poverty: The “Trickle Down” Hypothesis Reexamined. Economics and Finance in Indonesia , 51 , 291–324.

Siregar, D., & Dewi, DK (2022). INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW . Publisher Qiara Media.

Sujatmiko, A. (2016). Settlement of Trademark Disputes According to Law Number 15 of 2001. ADHAPER: Journal of Civil Procedure Law , 2 (1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v2i1.30

Umar Purba, AZ (2022). TRIP's agreement and some strategic issues . Alumni Publisher.

Widiantoro, RF (2022). Trademark Registration as a Means of Legal Protection. Lex Renaissance , 7 (2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss2.art14

Yin, RK (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sixth edition). SAGE.

Yusanto, Y. (2020). Variety of Qualitative Research Approaches. JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION (JSC) , 1 (1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.31506/jsc.v1i1.7764

Downloads

Published

06/15/2023

How to Cite

Saputra, A. (2023). TRADEMARK GUDANG GARAM VERSUS GUDANG BARU. ANAYASA : Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.61397/ays.v1i1.7

Issue

Section

Articles