ANALYSIS OF NAME LOAN AGREEMENT IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF FREEDOM OF CONTRACT

Benny Bastian

doi:10.61397/ays.v2i2.318

Authors

Benny Bastian Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61397/ays.v2i2.318

Keywords:

Name Borrowing Agreement, Land Ownership Rights, Freedom of Contract

Abstract

Nominee agreements are one of the interesting legal issues in the Indonesian legal system, especially in the context of acquiring land ownership rights. This practice is often used to avoid various applicable legal restrictions, both related to the legal subject and the land use itself. In agrarian law, land ownership rights can only be owned by Indonesian citizens (WNI), as regulated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles (UUPA). However, nominee agreements are often used to get around mandatory legal provisions, thus raising questions about their validity from the perspective of freedom of contract. This study aims to analyze the legality of nominee agreements between Indonesian citizens concerning acquiring land ownership rights, using a descriptive qualitative approach. The data were analyzed based on the provisions of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), especially Articles 1320 and 1338 which regulate the requirements for the validity of agreements and the principle of freedom of contract. The results of the analysis show that although a name-borrowing agreement can be made based on an agreement between the parties, objectives that are contrary to the law make this agreement legally invalid. This practice also violates the principle of freedom of contract because it is used to smuggle coercive legal provisions. The legal consequences of a name-borrowing agreement are null and void so the rights and obligations arising from the agreement are not recognized. In conclusion, the title loan agreement cannot be legally protected and has the potential to pose legal risks to the land objects involved. Therefore, legal protection can only be given to agreements made per applicable legal provisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, Apriyodi, Fitrian, Achmad, & Hutomo, Putra. (2022). Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Sebuah Perjanjian Baku Ditinjau Berdasarkan Pasal 1338 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 1(2), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v1i2.234

Bhawika Wimala Pastika, Dinda, Aprilia, Dina, Yuslani Eoh, Soraya, & Zoe Faith, Bryant. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah Yang Dibalik Nama Tanpa Persetujuan Pemegang Hak (Studi Kasus: Mafia Tanah ART Nirina Zubir). Gorontalo Law Review, 5(1), 212–227.

Boedi, Harsono. (1999). Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Isi dan Pelaksanaannya, Djambatan, Jakarta, hlm.72.

Perdana, Putra Aditya. (2011). Dunia Kian Tergantung Pada Negara Berkembang.

Pratiwi, Ni Made Ayu, Budiartha, I. Nyoman Putu, & Styawati, Ni Komang Arini. (2021). Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Pinjam-Meminjam Uang yang Dinyatakan Batal Demi Hukum. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 2(2), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.2.3257.367-372

Rizal Pahleviannur, Anita De Grave, Dani Nur Saputra, Dedi Mardianto, Ns. Debby Sinthania, Lis Hafrida, Vidriana Oktoviana Bano, Eko Edy Susanto, Ardhana Januar Mahardhani, Amruddin, & Mochamad Doddy Syahirul Alam, Mutia Lisya, Dasep Bayu Ahyar. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. In Deepublish.

Romli, Muhammad. (n.d.). KONSEP SYARAT SAH AKAD DALAM HUKUM ISLAM DAN SYARAT SAH PERJANJIAN DALAM PASAL 1320 KUH PERDATA.

Samudra, Dian, & Hibar, Ujang. (2021). Studi Komparasi Sahnya Perjanjian Antara Pasal 1320 K.U.H.Perdata Dengan Pasal 52 Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.46306/rj.v1i1.9

Santoso Urip. (2010). Pendaftaran dan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah. Kencana, Jakarta, 2010, hlm. 399.

Setiawan, R. (2007). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan. Bina Cipta, Bandung, hlm. 49.

Subekti. (2007). Hukum Perjanjian,. PT.Intermasa, Jakarta, 2007, hlm.1.

Suwanjaya, I. Komang Gede, Sumardika, I. Nyoman, & Ujianti, Ni Made Puspasutari. (2020). Perjanjian Pinjam Nama sebagai Bentuk Kepemilikan Tanah oleh Warga Negara Asing di Bali. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 1(2), 384–387. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.1.2544.384-387

Wicaksono, Dian Agung, Yurista, Ananda Prima, & Sari, Almonika Cindy Fatika. (2019). Mendudukkan Kasultanan Dan Kadipaten Sebagai Subyek Hak Milik Atas Tanah Kasultanan Dan Tanah Kadipaten Dalam Keistimewaan Yogyakarta. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(3), 311. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i3.342