JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN PKPU DECISIONS AGAINST DEBTORS UNDERGOING HOMOLOGATION

Eli Ristiana  Simandalahi; Martono Anggusti; Roida Nababan

doi:10.61397/ays.v2i2.333

Authors

Eli Ristiana Simandalahi Universitas HKBP Nommensen Sumatera Utara
Martono Anggusti Universitas HKBP Nommensen Sumatera Utara
Roida Nababan Universitas HKBP Nommensen Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61397/ays.v2i2.333

Keywords:

PKPU, Homologation, Creditors

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal considerations of judges in PKPU decisions against debtors who are executing homologation decisions and examine the legal provisions related to PKPU applications against the same debtor based on Law No. 37 of 2004. This study also highlights the legal phenomena related to two different decisions (homologation and bankruptcy) that occur to the same debtor and their legal impact on the company. The method used in this research is a normative juridical approach with a case study of PT Sabang Subur. Data was collected through literature study and analysis of related court decisions. The results showed that the differences in legal interpretation in the application of PKPU to debtors who have carried out homologation can lead to legal uncertainty. Therefore, this research is expected to provide insight for legal practitioners regarding the aspects that need to be considered in making legal decisions related to PKPU applications to create legal certainty and justice in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amalia, S., & Judge, Z. (2023). Analysis of The Commercial Court’s Decision on The Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations to Life Insurance Companies Without The Approval of The Financial Service Authority: Case Study Case Number 389/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Jkt. Pst. Jurnal Legisci, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.62885/legisci.v1i2.90

Apriyanto, H., & Raspita, D. (2024). APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF JUSTICE TO PKPU APPLICATIONS BY DEBTORS AND BANKRUPTCY APPLICATIONS BY CREDITORS. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v6i1.355

Ardhia, N. D., Suryono, L. J., & Darajat, L. O. M. R. (2024). The Debtor’s Juridical Analysis of Bankruptcy Decisions as A Consequence of Homologation Violations in Suspention of Payment: The case study decision numbers 20/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019/PN.Smg, jo. Numbers 23/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2018/PN. Smg. LAW&PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11653366

Ariffani, A., Sahputra, R., & Azmi, S. (2023). Analysis Of Consideration Of The Judge’s Decision The Process Of Management And Settlement Of The Debtor’s Property After The Bankruptcy Of The Debtor In Bankruptcy (Case Study No. 1/Pdt.Sus-Renvoi Prosedur/2022/PN.Niaga.Mdn). International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 2(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v2i4.69

Asri, M., Noerhadi, C. C., & Mardani, M. (2023). Analysis of the Supreme Court Decision that Canceled the Decision of the Jakarta Commercial Court in the PKPU Case of PT Asuransi Jiwa Kresna. Justice Voice, 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v2i2.787

Faisal, F. (2024). Application for Bankruptcy Declaration or Suspension of Debt Payment Obligation for Developers Viewed from the Principles of Balance and Justice. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 23(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.4857

Iswadi, I., Karnati, N., & Andry B, A. (2023). STUDI KASUS Desain Dan Metode Robert K.Yin. Penerbit Adab.

Mahendra, S., Sulistiyono, A., & Suwadi, P. (2024). Legal Protection of PKPU Management Actions After Constitutional Court Decision Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021 from a Pancasila Justice Perspective. 255–259. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-218-7_42

Nurhabsari, I. N. (2024). QUESTIONING PKPU REPEATEDLY IN THE MIDST OF THE RAMPANT PKPU APPLICATION AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO DEBTOR DEBT SETTLEMENT. JOURNAL EQUITABLE, 9(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v9i3.7156

Pratama, N., & Putra, M. F. M. (2023). Juridical Analysis of PKPU Decision by The Court on Application for PKPU Revocation by The Debitor. Kosmik Hukum, 23(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v23i1.16969

Rorong, T. J., & Djaja, B. (2023). LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION IN THE CASE OF A REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT OF DEBT PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS AGAINST INSURANCE LEGAL CERTAINTY IN INDONESIA. Jurnal Scientia, 12(03), Article 03. https://doi.org/10.58471/scientia.v12i03.1626

Sihotang, Z. (2021). Duties And Authority Of PKPU Management Basen On Law No. 37 Of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy And Suspension Debt Payment Obligations. Journal of Law Science, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v3i1.1650

Yitawati, K., Pujiyono, & Sulistiyono, A. (2022). Constitutional Court Decision Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021: Analysis of Judges’ Considerations Is It Permissible to Take Cassation Against Decisions to Postpone Debt Payment Obligations? Jurnal Jurisprudence, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i1.1039