THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (PTUN) TO ADJUDICATE POSITIVE FICTITIOUS DECISIONS FROM A PERSPECTIVE OF JUSTICE

Nowo Laksono; Krisnadi Nasution; Budiarsih Budiarsih

doi:10.61397/ays.v3i1.413

Authors

Nowo Laksono Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Krisnadi Nasution Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Budiarsih Budiarsih Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61397/ays.v3i1.413

Keywords:

State Administrative Court, positive fictitious decision, justice

Abstract

The Administrative Court (PTUN) plays an important role in safeguarding the principles of legal certainty, justice, and protection of citizens' rights in Indonesia's administrative legal system. One of the emerging issues is positive fictitious decisions, which stipulate that if an administrative official does not issue a decision within a certain period, the petition is deemed to have been granted. This study aims to explore the authority of the PTUN in adjudicating positive fictitious decisions from a justice perspective. The method used is normative legal research that analyzes relevant regulations and their implementation in practice. The findings reveal that regulatory changes through Law No. 6 of 2023 have created legal uncertainty, reduced the PTUN's authority to adjudicate positive fictitious decisions, and created potential injustices for the public. This study recommends that the PTUN be granted the authority to adjudicate positive fictitious decisions while considering the principle of substantive justice, and the need for clearer regulations regarding oversight mechanisms within the automated administrative system. This study concludes that the removal of the PTUN's authority without clear alternative solutions contradicts the fundamental principles of the rule of law and has the potential to harm the public in accessing administrative justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akpuokwe, C. U., Adeniyi, A. O., Bakare, S. S., & Eneh, N. E. (2024). the Impact of Judicial Reforms on Legal Systems: a Review in African Countries. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i3.850

Bernadika, S. R., & Afriyie, F. A. (2023). The Legitimacy of Letters as Evidence in the E- Litigation Proof System within the State Administrative Court. Indonesian State Law Review, 6(2), 221–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v6i1.68236

Cahyandari, D. (2023). The Good Governance Principle in Fictitious-Positive Case Applications After the Job Creation Law. Yustisia, 12(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v12i1.63999

Diantha, I. M. P. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Prenada Media.

Henman, P. W. F. (2021). Administrative Justice in a Digital World: Challenges and Solutions. In M. Hertogh, R. Kirkham, R. Thomas, & J. Tomlinson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Administrative Justice (pp. 459–480). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190903084.013.23

Heryansyah, D. (2020). Shifting the Absolute Competence of State Administrative Justice in the Indonesian Legal System. International and Public Affairs, 4(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20200402.12

Hidayah, R., Asmara, G., & Purnomo, C. E. (2024). Analysis of the Implementation of Community Participation in the Formation of Legal Regulations (A Juridical Review of the Ruling of the Constitutional Court Number 82/PUU-XXI/2023). RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 9(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2024.v09.n02.021

Johnny Ibrahim. (2008). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.

Kosasih, A. (2018). Analisa Kritis Gugatan Voluntair Terhadap Praktik Maladministrasi Di Bidang Pelayanan Publik. MIZANI, 3(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.29300/MZN.V3I1.1022

Kristiawan, G. B., Sugiantari, A. A. P. W., & Sudirga, I. M. (2024). Perlindungan Hak Bagi Pemohon Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Akibat Permohonan Fiktip Positif Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Denpasar. Jurnal Yustitia, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.62279/yustitia.v18i1.1191

Kupita, W. (2021). Ordinary State Administrative Dispute and Positive-Fictitious decisions Dispute in Administrative Court (PTUN), In Relation to Administrative Appeal. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 21(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2021.21.1.2922

Kupita, W., & Ardhanariswari, R. (2023). Fictitious-Positive Decision Dispute Resolution at PTUN For the Achieving Unity of Proceedings and Legal Certainty. Proceeding ICMA-SURE, 2(1), 176. https://doi.org/10.20884/2.procicma.2023.2.1.7750

Manaan, S. V. N. P., Dimalouw, M. C., & Tjandra, W. R. (2024). Legal Uncertainty in Positive Fictitious Applications under Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration after the Enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 07(01), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i01-27

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.

Mazur, J. (2021). Can public access to documents support the transparency of automated decision-making? The European Union law perspective. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 29(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaa019

McCann, S. (2023). Discretion in the Automated Administrative State. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 36(1), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2022.25

Paskara, A. (2023). The role of administrative court in ensuring human rights protection under martial law. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 14(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2023-0207

Pertiwi, A. P., Rompis, A. E., & Nurzaman, R. A. (2023). the Elimination of State Administrative Court’S Authority To Decide Positive Fictitious Decisions After the Amendment To Law Number 30 of 2014 Connected With the General Principles of Good Governance. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 5(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v5i1.1390

Prasetyo, T. (2019). Penelitian Hukum: Suatu Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Nusa Media.

Rochmawanto, M., Suhartono, S., Hufron, & Hadi, S. (2022). Urgency of establishing responsive local regulations to realize good local governance. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 38(December), 192–196.

Wurid. (2022). Kontekstualisasi Norma Fiktif Positif Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Yustitia, 8(2), 122–135. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

Zamzami, A., & Muslim, S. (2023). Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Masyarakat. Widya Yuridika, 6(3), 405. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v6i3.4530

Zarikyan, K. (2024). Judicial Review Of Administrative Regulations: Constitutional Justice vs Administrative Justice. The POLITNOMOS Journal of Political and Legal Studies, 3(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.54503/2953-8165-2024.3(2)-71

Zegarlicki, J. (2018). Legal certainty as an important value of the rule of law. Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 6(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.14746/fped.2017.6.2.19