THE INFLUENCE OF LECTURER COMMUNICATION STYLE ON STUDENT UNDERSTANDING IN ONLINE LEARNING

Authors

  • Moh. Mahfud Institut Agama Islam Al-Khairat Pamekasan
  • Zainullah Zainullah Institut Agama Islam Al-Khairat Pamekasan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61397/tla.v1i3.352

Keywords:

Lecturer Communication Style, Student Understanding, Online Learning, Verbal Communication, Non-Verbal Communication

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of lecturers' communication style on students' understanding in online learning, with a focus on verbal and non-verbal communication styles, the use of technology, and collaborative and adaptive approaches. The research method used is a quantitative approach with an explanatory research design. Data were collected through an online questionnaire completed by 200 students from various universities in Indonesia. Data analysis was performed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and multiple linear regression to examine the relationship between lecturer communication style variables and student understanding. The results showed that verbal communication style had the most dominant influence on student understanding, with a contribution of 35%. Non-verbal communication style and the use of technology each contributed 20% and 25%, while collaborative and adaptive communication styles contributed 18% and 22%. These findings confirm that a combination of clear delivery of material, effective use of technology, and a collaborative and adaptive approach can significantly improve student understanding. However, this study also identifies challenges such as the limitations of online platforms in displaying non-verbal communication and the digital divide among students.

References

Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562

Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890

Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3

Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2018). Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies. Distance Education, 39(4), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520041

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson. https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/12789

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

Gayle, B. M., Preiss, R. W., Burrell, N., & Allen, M. (Ed.). (2009). Classroom Communication and Instructional Processes: Advances Through Meta-Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933145

Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies [Monograph]. Centre for Learning Technology. https://repository.alt.ac.uk/629/

Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001

Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online Education and Its Effective Practice: A Research Review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502

Downloads

Published

30-05-2024

How to Cite

Mahfud, M., & Zainullah, Z. (2024). THE INFLUENCE OF LECTURER COMMUNICATION STYLE ON STUDENT UNDERSTANDING IN ONLINE LEARNING. TOPLAMA, 1(3), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.61397/tla.v1i3.352

Issue

Section

Articles