VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF ADOLESCENT LEARNING STYLE INSTRUMENT (IGBR) DEVELOPMENT: RASCH MODEL ANALYSIS

Delvira Nur  Anbiya; Aam Imaddudin; Dewang Sulistiana

doi:10.61397/jkpp.v3i1.322

Authors

Delvira Nur Anbiya Universitas Muhammadiyah Tasikmalaya
Aam Imaddudin Universitas Muhammadiyah Tasikmalaya
Dewang Sulistiana Universitas Muhammadiyah Tasikmalaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61397/jkpp.v3i1.322

Keywords:

Development, Validity, Reliability, Learning Style, RASCH Model

Abstract

Learning style is the way each learner begins to contribute to processing, processing and retain new and difficult information. The development of an adolescent learning style instrument helps students to identify learning style patterns based on the theory used. However, the limitations of the adolescent learning style instrument have only been tested on junior high school students. This research aims to develop, test the validity and reliability of an adolescent learning style instrument using the Winstep software RASCH model. Participants in this research were 840 students at the junior high school level in Tasikmalaya City and Regency. The results of the item validity test using the RASCH Model program Winstep software show that all items are valid (126 items) with the Outfit Mean Square (MNSQ) value. The results of the reliability test of the adolescent learning style instrument, consisting of 126 items, were declared valid; the Cronbach's Alpha value was 0.85, which is in the very good category. The Person Reliability value of 0.87 is at a good level. And the Item Reliability value of 0.99 shows that the level of item consistency is in the special category.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 173.

Cholifah, Tety Nur, Studi, Program, Dasar, Pendidikan, Islam, Universitas, Rahmat, Raden, Pembelajaran, Kualitas, & Pembelajaran, Peningkatan Kualitas. (2018). Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE). 01, 65–74.

Coaley, Keith. (2010). An Introduction to Psychological Assesment and Psychometrict. London: Sage Publication Ltd.

Dunn. R & Dunn. K. (1992). Teaching Elementary Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles: Practi_cal Approaches for Grades 3–6. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Dunn, Rita, & Dunn, Kenneth. (1993). Teaching Secondary Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles.

Fitriani, Anisa, & Yusri, Fadhilla. (2022). Tingkat Kemandirian Belajar Pada Remaja. Consilium : Berkala Kajian Konseling Dan Ilmu Keagamaan, 9(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.37064/consilium.v9i1.11332

Hermawati, Lilik Istianingsih, & Andayani, Endah. (2020). Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru , Model Discovery Learning , dan Gaya Belajar Terhadap Kemandirian Belajar. 14(1), 22–30.

Ifdil, I. (2010). Pendidikan Karakter dalam Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(2), 55–61.

Kamaluddin, H., Muhammadiyah, Universitas, & Hamka, Prof. (2011). Bimbingan dan Konseling Sekolah. 447–454.

Mashurwati, Yuyun. (2018). PENERAPAN INVENTORY TES GAYA BELAJAR REMAJA DENGAN APLIKASI GOOGLE FORM , MEDIA SOSIAL SERTA PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM LAYANAN. 1–6.

Nurkancana, Wayan, & Sunartana, PPN. (1992). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Papilaya, J. O., & Huliselan, Neleke. (2016). IDENTIFIKASI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA Jeanete Ophilia Papilaya, Neleke Huliselan. 15(1), 56–63.

Rijal, Syamsu, & Bachtiar, Suhaedir. (2015). Hubungan antara Sikap, Kemandirian Belajar, dan Gaya Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa. Jurnal Bioedukatika, 3(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v3i2.4149

Santrock. (2017). Adolescene Perkembangan Remaja Edisi Keenam. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sappaile, Baso Intang. (2007). Konsep Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 13(66), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v13i66.356

Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (12th ed.). Pearson.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarson.W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Bandung: Trim Komunikata Publisher.

Sundayana, Rostina. (2016). Kaitan antara Gaya Belajar, Kemandirian Belajar, dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP dalam Pelajaran Matematika. 75–84.

Tavakol, Mohsen, & Dennick, Reg. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach ’ s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd