MASS MEDIA MONOPOLY IN INDONESIA IN THE MEDIA BUSINESS INDUSTRY

Dwi Kurniawan Riyadi Putra; Witri Cahyati; Muhammad Fikri Gissani

doi:10.61397/tla.v3i1.433

Authors

Dwi Kurniawan Riyadi Putra Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP
Witri Cahyati Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP
Muhammad Fikri Gissani Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61397/tla.v3i1.433

Keywords:

media monopoly, press freedom, content diversity, digital transformation, democracy, Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to critically examine the phenomenon of media monopolies in Indonesia and their implications for press freedom, content diversity, and democratic discourse. Mass media play a crucial role in society as a provider of information, education, entertainment, and social control, as stipulated in Law No. 40 of 1999 on the Press. However, the persistence of monopolistic practices, despite the prohibition outlined in Law No. 5 of 1999 on Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, raises significant concerns regarding the imbalance between regulation and reality. Employing a qualitative research design with a literature study approach, this research synthesizes scholarly journals, books, and legal documents to interpret the patterns and consequences of media concentration in Indonesia. The methodology allows for the integration of diverse perspectives from communication studies, economics, law, and political science, thereby constructing a comprehensive understanding of media monopoly dynamics. The findings reveal that media ownership in Indonesia is highly concentrated among a few conglomerates, leading to reduced content diversity, weakened independent journalism, and narrowed public discourse. Digital transformation, while initially viewed as a democratizing force, has enabled new configurations of monopoly, with algorithms and platform dominance amplifying established corporate voices and marginalizing smaller players. Regulatory gaps and limited enforcement capacity further exacerbate these issues, allowing oligopolistic practices to persist across traditional and digital domains. This study concludes that addressing media monopolies requires robust regulatory reforms, strengthened institutional frameworks, and enhanced media literacy initiatives to preserve pluralism, ensure press freedom, and maintain the democratic function of the media.

References

Abdul Aziz, A. Z., Abas Hidayat, A. H., Ellin Herlina, E. H., & Wanti Ernawati, W. E. (2023). Oligopoly Market and Monopolistic Competition in the Digital Era: Shariah Economic Perspective. Quality Access to Success, 24(193), 61–67.

Adegbayibi, A. T. (2025). Forensic Accounting and Fraud Management of Listed Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria. Global Journal of Accounting, 11(1), 95–104.

Adorjan, M., & Ricciardelli, R. (2021). Smartphone and social media addiction: Exploring the perceptions and experiences of Canadian teenagers. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 58(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12319

Akalili, A. (2020). The relevance of broadcasting regulation in the era of media convergence. Journal of Social Studies (JSS), 16(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.21831/jss.v16i2.30619

Anderson, J. A. (2011). Communication Yearbook 13. Routledge.

Anggarini, D., & Dewi, D. S. K. (2021). MONOPOLY ON MARINE AND FISHERIES POLICY ON LOBSTER MANAGEMENT IN 2020. Jurnal Ilmiah Tata Sejuta STIA Mataram, 7(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.32666/tatasejuta.v7i1.200

Aulia, M. Z., & Raffles, R. (2021). PEMUSATAN KEPEMILIKAN MEDIA MASSA DI INDONESIA: TINJAUAN ASPEK HUKUM. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no1.3013

Austin, L., Gaither, B., & Gaither, T. K. (2019). Corporate Social Advocacy as Public Interest Communications: Exploring Perceptions of Corporate Involvement in Controversial Social-Political Issues. The Journal of Public Interest Communications, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v3.i2.p3

Bardos, K. S., Ertugrul, M., & Gao, L. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility, product market perception, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 62, 101588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101588

Berger, C. R., Roloff, M. E., & Ewoldsen, D. R. (2009). The Handbook of Communication Science. SAGE Publications.

Bowyer, B. T., Kahne, J. E., & Middaugh, E. (2017). Youth comprehension of political messages in YouTube videos. New Media & Society, 19(4), 522–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815611593

Faujura, R. P., Gultom, E., & Sudjana, S. (2021). THE MONOPOLY PRACTICE AND UNFAIR BUSINESS COMPETITION IN THE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ACTIVITY THROUGH THE FOREIGN PATENT IN INDONESIA. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 69–91.

Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. (2020). Information and communication technologies and human resources in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(11), 3545–3579. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2020-0272

Hartana, H. (2020). IMPLICATION OF GROUP COMPANY EXPANSION TO MONOPOLY PRCTICE AND UNFAIR BUSINESS COMPETITION (Study Case: Coal Mining Industry). Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23467

Irfan, M., Jain, V., Parveen, A., & Kumar, M. (2021). Factors Responsible for the Digital Marketing Communication and Customer Loyalty: A Study of Fabindia.

Kundu, A., & Sarangi, N. (2007). Migration, Employment Status and Poverty: An Analysis across Urban Centres. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(4), 299–306.

Mahasin, M. Z., Rochwulaningsih, Y., & Sulistiyono, S. T. (2023). The persistence of Chinese monopoly in Indonesia’s salt business and marginalisation of local salt farmers. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 28(3), 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2021.1955514

Mahendrawati, N. L. M. (2021). Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in Indonesia: A Legal Mechanism to Balance the Public Interest. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.120

Masduki, M., & D’haenens, L. (2022). Concentration of Media Ownership in Indonesia: A Setback for Viewpoint Diversity. International Journal of Communication.

Nanda, M. A. P., & Ardilla, Y. P. (2024). Media Convergence: The Realization of Monopoly and Oligopoly in Indonesia". Semantik: Journal of Social, Media, Communication, and Journalism, 1(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.31958/semantik.v1i2.10941

Nugroho, I. (2021). The Dynamics of Mass Media Resistance toward Google. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 6(2), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v6i2.856

Poti, J., & Khairie Ahmad, M. (2021). Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context. Social Sciences, 10(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14

Rachmiatie, A., & Ravena, D. (2020). THE ORDER OF BROADCASTING REGULATION IN REGULATING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BROADCASTING MEDIA (TELEVISION AND RADIO) IN ESTABLISHING LOCAL IDENTITY AND CULTURE. International Journal of Business and Society, 21(1).

Singarimbun, K., Karlinah, S., Darwis, Y., & Hidayat, D. R. (2023). Indonesian radio business model: Radio network. Journal of Media Business Studies, 20(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2021.2024983

Souisa, H. Y. (2020). Broadcasting Paradox? A Study of Content Diversity and Ownership in Contemporary Indonesian Television.

Sukarmi, Tejomurti, K., & Silalahi, U. (2024). Digital market and its adequacy of merger assessment in Indonesian business competition law. International Journal of Law and Management, 66(6), 694–719. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-08-2023-0185

Widyatama, R., & Polereczki, Z. (2020). The Indonesia Policy on Television Broadcasting: A Politics and Economics Perspective. IRANIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 8, 1–10.