DIGITAL ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT IN QUALITY ASSURANCE OF ISLAMIC EDUCATION LEARNING OUTCOMES AT MAN 18 JAKARTA

Masitoh Masitoh

doi:10.61397/jkpp.v4i1.556

Authors

Masitoh Masitoh Universitas PTIQ Jakarta Selatan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61397/jkpp.v4i1.556

Keywords:

digital assessment, Islamic Religious Education, assessment management, internal quality assurance, SPMI, madrasah

Abstract

Digital transformation in education requires madrasahs to develop an assessment system that is not only effective in measuring learning outcomes but also capable of supporting the continuous quality assurance of learning outcomes. This study aims to analyze the management of digital-based learning assessments in the subject of Islamic Religious Education (PAI) and its contribution to the Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) at MAN 18 Jakarta. The study employs a qualitative approach using a descriptive-analytical method. Informants were selected through purposive sampling, including the madrasah principal, the vice principal for curriculum, the Madrasah Education Quality Assurance Team (TPMPS), PAI teachers, and students. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and analysis of documentation such as teaching modules, assessment instruments, rubrics, and digital learning outcome data. Data validity was strengthened through triangulation of sources and methods, while data analysis utilized the interactive model proposed by Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The research findings indicate that digital assessment management occurs through four main processes: planning assessment instruments aligned with learning outcomes; conducting assessments via digital platforms; utilizing analytical data on learning outcomes; and quality control and improvement through the PPEPP cycle. Assessment data is used to identify learning mastery, design remedial and enrichment programs, evaluate the quality of assessment instruments, and recalibrate teachers’ instructional strategies. Challenges such as varying levels of digital literacy, connectivity issues, and infrastructure limitations are addressed through ongoing training and contingency procedures. The study concludes that digital assessment management can serve as a strategic tool for fostering data-driven decision-making and sustainably improving the quality of Islamic Religious Education (IRE) learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2024). Keputusan Menteri Agama Nomor 450 Tahun 2024 tentang pedoman implementasi kurikulum pada Raudhatul Athfal, Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Madrasah Tsanawiyah, Madrasah Aliyah, dan Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan. Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia.

Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Pelaporan Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal. Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Lisnawati, S., Kumalasari, E. D., Subagiya, B., & Syarifuddin, M. (2026). A digital-based assessment model integrating religious character values in Islamic Religious Education: Toward decolonizing Islamic studies. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v12i1.50075

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Motsoeneng, T. J., & Moreeng, B. B. (2024). Evaluation of feedback as an assessment for learning strategy in accounting education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 6, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2024.vol6.17

Nurmaliati, A. U. A., & Asra, A. (2024). Using assessment as learning with active feedback: Effect on student achievement. Indonesia Journal of Engineering and Education Technology, 2(2), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.61991/ijeet.v2i2.46

Nurohmah, E. Y., & Ma'rifah, S. (2025). From paper-based to digital assessment: Adoption and challenges of learning evaluation applications in Islamic education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.70376/jerp.v3i1.206

OECD. (2023). Digital assessment. In OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2022 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. (2022).

Ramadhani, T., Sary, A. N., Zainuri, A., & Zahra, F. F. (2026). Model penjaminan mutu internal (SPMI) berbasis digital dalam meningkatkan efektivitas pembelajaran di madrasah ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Manajemen Akuntansi dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 3(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.70585/jumali.v3i1.198

Rozianti, Z. L., Ulfah, D., Muhajir, S., Hasri, S., & Sohiron. (2026). The strategic role of madrasah self-evaluation (EDM) in the optimization of quality assurance. Sosioedukasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.8428

Sadhana, R., & Freire, A. (2025). A web-based student learning outcome assessment system for secondary education: Design, development, and empirical evaluation. Ceddi Journal of Education, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.56134/cje.v4i2.157

Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003

Sitorus, A. S., & Dahlan, Z. (2024). Model sistem penjaminan mutu internal program studi Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Sumatera Utara Medan. Islamic Management: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30868/im.v7i01.5319

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.