ASSESSMENT OF CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR EFFECTIVE SUPPLIERS’ SELECTION

ASSESSING THE DIMENSION, THEORY AND EFFECT OF ETHICS CULTURE TOWARDS SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE

Authors

  • Olawale Amuzat Binary University of Management and Entrepreneurship Malaysia
  • Ndifreke Akaninyene ENO University of Uyo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61397/mfc.v2i1.184

Keywords:

Supplier selection, critical success factors, ethical culture

Abstract

This research aims to assess the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for effective supplier selection, focusing on the dimensions, theory, and impact of ethical culture on supplier performance. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to gather comprehensive data from public and private sector companies. Key factors evaluated include quality, price, technical capability, ethical culture, performance history, and reputation. The quantitative data reveals that quality is the primary criterion, followed by competitive pricing and technical capabilities. Ethical culture is highlighted as a significant influence on supplier performance, affecting trust and long-term relationships. Qualitative insights emphasize the positive experiences companies have with ethical suppliers and the challenges in assessing ethical culture. The findings are discussed about value co-creation theory, which underscores the collaborative creation of mutual value between companies and suppliers, and agency theory, which addresses the principal-agent relationship and potential conflicts of interest. Practical implications suggest that companies should incorporate ethical culture assessments into their supplier selection processes and focus on building long-term relationships with reputable suppliers. This approach can enhance operational efficiency, trust, and overall performance. The study concludes that integrating these critical factors into supplier selection can significantly improve the strategic outcomes and competitiveness of companies.

References

Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69

Ainy, R. N., & Barokah, Z. (2019). Corporate Governance, Environmental Responsibility, and Firm Value: An Empirical Study in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.2002117

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2014). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach. In Pearson Prentice Hall (14th ed.). Pearson Education. www.bea.gov

Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00287.x

Bovens, M. (2007). Analyzing and assessing accountability: a conceptual frameworkE.L.J. 2007, 13(4), 447-468. European Law Journal, 13(4).

Brodersen, K. H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S. L. (2015). Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-AOAS788

Cho, C. H., Guidry, R. P., Hageman, A. M., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Do actions speak louder than words? An empirical investigation of corporate environmental reputation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(1), 14– 25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.12.001

COSO. (2017). Enterprise Risk Management Integrating with Strategy and Performance. In COSO Enterprise Risk Management (Issue June). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269145

COSO. (2023). ACHIEVING EFFECTIVE INTERNAL CONTROL OVER SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING (ICSR): Building Trust and Confidence through the COSO Internal Control-Integrated Framework. In COSO-ICSR Report. www.coso.org

P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35

DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002

Deumes, R., & Knechel, W. R. (2008). Economic incentives for voluntary reporting on internal risk management and control systems. Auditing, 27(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.1.35

Firdausi, S., & Prihandana, W. A. (2022). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, dan Leverage Terhadap Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Indeks SRI KEHATI Tahun 2014- 2018). Jurnal Akuntansi AKUNESA, 10(2), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.26740/akunesa.v10n2.p12-23

Firmansyah, D., & Dede. (2022). Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik (JIPH), 1(2), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.55927/jiph.v1i2.937

Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5). https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469955

Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1), 405–440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0

Imelia, D., Rahayu, S., & Wiralestari. (2021). PENGARUH KOMPETENSI SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA, PARTISIPASI PENYUSUNAN ANGGARAN, PEMANFAATAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI DAN SISTEM PENGENDALIAN INTERNAL TERHADAP KUALITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN PEMDA KERINCI. JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN KEUANGAN UNIVERSITAS JAMBI, 6(3), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210051927c006

Jashari, M. & Pepaj, I. (2018). The Role of the Principle of Transparency and Accountability in Public Administration. Administration, 10(1), 60–69.

Jati, B. P. (2019). PENGARUH PENERAPAN STANDAR AKUNTANSI PEMERINTAHAN BERBASIS AKRUAL TERHADAP KUALITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH. WAHANA, 21(1), 1–14.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Juliani, S., & Siregar, S. (2019). The Effect of Managerial Ability on Financial Reporting Quality: An Empirical Analysis of the Banking Industry. Proceedings of the 1st Sampoerna University-AFBE International Conference, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-12-2018.2286275

Karim, R. A., & Mursalim, M. (2019). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Transparansi Dan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan. PARADOKS : Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 2(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.33096/paradoks.v2i1.105

Mahmudi. (2019). Analisis Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. UPP STIM YKPN. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=_W_vzwEACAAJ

Maydiyanti, S., Putri, A. M., & Anriva, D. H. (2020). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomika, 10(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.37859/jae.v10i1.1975

Nurhayati, N., Purnama, D., & Mustika, M. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Pendukung Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa. JIAFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi), 7(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.34204/jiafe.v7i2.4072

Olojede, P., Erin, O., Asiriuwa, O., & Usman, M. (2020). Audit expectation gap: an empirical analysis. Future Business Journal, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-020-00016-x

Ompusunggu, S. G., & Salomo, R. V. (2019). Analisis Pelaksanaan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 5(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2019.005.01.10

Palalangan, C. A. (2020). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Kasus Pada Kantor Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Dan Penataan Ruang Kab. Mamasa). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 4(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.38043/jiab.v4i2.2260

Pinintasih, T. S., & Salendu, A. (2022). Hubungan Kepemimpinan Etis, Budaya Organisasi, dan Kepercayaan Afektif dalam Membentuk Akuntabilitas Karyawan. Psikodimensia, 21(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.24167/psidim.v21i2.4633

Puspa, D. F., & Prasetyo, R. A. (2020). Pengaruh Kompetensi Pemerintah Desa, Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Dan Aksesibilitas Laporan Keuangan Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi, 20(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v20i2.7894

Ramdhani, A., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2017). Konsep Umum Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal Publik, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMENS.2005.96

Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2020). Accounting Information Systems, 15th Global Edition (15th ed.). Pearson Education. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=zqc5EAAAQBAJ

Sholeh, M. I. (2023). TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITAS DALAM MEMBANGUN CITRA POSITIF MELALUI MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN YANG BERKUALITAS. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 43–55.

Simunic, D. A. (1980). The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2490397

Sudrajat, A. R. (2021). Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi Publik Bagaimana Pengaruh Terhadap Kinerja Satuan Perangkat Daerah di Kabupaten Sumedang. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(4), 395–402.

Suryani, P. (2021). Pengaruh Partisipasi Publik, Akuntabilitas, Transparansi Dan Integritas Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Kabupaten Bengkulu Tengah. Jurnal Fairness, 9(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v9i1.15220

Thohari, A. H., Suhardi, S., Kurniawan, N. B., & Yustianto, P. (2017). Rekayasa Sistem Keterbukaan Data Pemerintah untuk Mendukung Transparansi dan Partisipasi Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro Dan Teknologi Informasi (JNTETI), 6(3). https://doi.org/10.22146/jnteti.v6i3.325

Vasarhelyi, M. A., Alles, M. G., & Kogan, A. (2018). Principles of Analytic Monitoring for Continuous Assurance. In D. Y. Chan, V. Chiu, & M. A. Vasarhelyi (Eds.), Continuous Auditing (pp. 191–217). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-413-420181009

Yoga, I. P., & Pradana, B. (2014). Transparansi Birokrasi dalam Pengelolaan APBD di Kota Kupang. Transparansi Birokrasi Dalam Pengelolaan APBD Di Kota Kupang, 18(2), 185–202.

Yosep, M., & Indriasih, D. (2020). KUALITAS PENERAPAN SISTEM INFORMASI AKUNTANSI MANAJEMEN PADA ENTITAS SEKTOR PUBLIK. SCOPINDO MEDIA PUSTAKA. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ck0CEAAAQBAJ

Zelovena, S. M., Jannah, A. A. A., & Kususmastuti, R. (2023). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Indonesia. GEMILANG: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 3(3), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.56910/gemilang.v3i3.632

Downloads

Published

2024-08-02

How to Cite

Amuzat, O., & ENO, N. A. (2024). ASSESSMENT OF CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR EFFECTIVE SUPPLIERS’ SELECTION: ASSESSING THE DIMENSION, THEORY AND EFFECT OF ETHICS CULTURE TOWARDS SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE. Multifinance, 2(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.61397/mfc.v2i1.184