COMPANY FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE RATIOS:  THE INFLUENCES OF THE STRUCTURE OF ASSETS, CASH HOLDING, FIRM SIZE AND INSTITUTIONAL HOLDINGS  ON DEBT POLICY

Aryanti Ratnawati; Cikal Ananda Putri; Senny Lusiana; Gunawan Gunawan; Muhammad Ariq Khalingga

doi:10.61397/mfc.v2i2.254

Authors

Aryanti Ratnawati Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP
Cikal Ananda Putri Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP
Senny Lusiana Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP
Gunawan Gunawan Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP
Muhammad Ariq Khalingga University of California Santa Cruz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61397/mfc.v2i2.254

Keywords:

Asset Structure, Cash Holding, Company Size, Institutional Ownership, Debt Policy

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test and analyze the influence of asset structure, cash holding, firm size and institutional ownership on the debt policy of food and beverage industry sub-sector companies on the IDX 2018-2021. Research method, the type of approach in this research is a Quantitative Approach. The sample of this study was obtained using the Purposive Sampling Method, obtained as many as 19 companies in the Food and Beverage Industry Sub-Sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2018-2021 Period. The analysis method used is Panel Data Regression Analysis. The results showed that partially Asset Structure has a significant positive effect on debt policy, Cash Holding hurts debt policy, Company Size has no significant positive effect on policy, Institutional Ownership has a significant positive effect on debt policy, simultaneously Asset Structure, Cash Holding, Company Size and Institutional Ownership have a significant positive effect on Debt Policy. Value, Asset Structure, Cash Holding and Institutional Ownership affect debt policy with a significance level <0.05 while company size has a significance level> 0.05, meaning that company size has no positive effect on debt policy.

References

Bai, X., Han, J., Ma, Y., & Zhang, W. (2022). ESG performance, institutional investors’ preference and financing constraints: Empirical evidence from China. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S157–S168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.013

Cao, J., Wang, H., & Zhou, S. (2022). Soft activism and corporate dividend policy: Evidence from institutional investors site visits. Journal of Corporate Finance, 75, 102221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102221

Chen, T., Dong, H., & Lin, C. (2020). Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(2), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.007

Juniatmoko, P., Fuad Hasyim, Annida Unatiq Ulya, Nurwulan Purnasari, Ronnawan. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Mix Method). GUEPEDIA.

Kim, I., Ryou, J. W., & Yang, R. (2020). The color of shareholders’ money: Institutional shareholders’ political values and corporate environmental disclosure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101704

Krishnankutty, R., & Jadiyappa, N. (2020). Ownership structure and receivables management. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(2), e2041. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2041

Loncan, T. (2020). Foreign institutional ownership and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from emerging economies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.12.003

Moin, A., Guney, Y., & El Kalak, I. (2020). The effects of ownership structure, sub-optimal cash holdings and investment inefficiency on dividend policy: Evidence from Indonesia. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 55(3), 857–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-019-00862-z

Nugraha, N. M., Johanes, S. R., & Hendiarto, R. S. (2021). The Effect Of Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, And Company Size To Dividend Policy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRENDS IN ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2(1), Article 1.

Ogabo, B., Ogar, G., & Nuipoko, T. (2021). Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: The Role of Managerial and Institutional Ownership-Evidence from the UK. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 11(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2021.117053

Queiri, A., Madbouly, A., Reyad, S., & Dwaikat, N. (2021). Corporate governance, ownership structure and firms’ financial performance: Insights from Muscat securities market (MSM30). Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(4), 640–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2020-0130

Sakawa, H., Watanabel, N., Duppati, G., & Faff, R. (2021). Institutional ownership and corporate risk-taking in Japanese listed firms. Applied Economics, 53(16), 1899–1914. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1854450

Tarighi, H., Appolloni, A., Shirzad, A., & Azad, A. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (CSRD) and Financial Distressed Risk (FDR): Does Institutional Ownership Matter? Sustainability, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020742

Tayachi, T., Hunjra, A. I., Jones, K., Mehmood, R., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2021). How does ownership structure affect the financing and dividend decisions of firm? Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(3), 729–746. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-09-2021-0291

Wu, B., Gu, Q., Liu, Z., & Liu, J. (2023). Clustered institutional investors, shared ESG preferences and low-carbon innovation in family firm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122676

Yildiz, Y. (2021). Foreign institutional investors, information asymmetries, and asset valuation in emerging markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 56, 101381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101381

Yun, J., Ahmad, H., Jebran, K., & Muhammad, S. (2021). Cash holdings and firm performance relationship: Do firm-specific factors matter? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 1283–1305. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1823241