THE EFFECT OF COMPENSATION ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE AT PT JOYCI NUSANTARA CEMERLANG

Nandita Melta Daughter; Fitria Lilyana; Nurhaeni Sikki

doi:10.61397/mfc.v3i3.516

Authors

Nandita Melta Daughter Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP
Fitria Lilyana Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP
Nurhaeni Sikki Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61397/mfc.v3i3.516

Keywords:

Compensation, Employee Performance, PT Joyci Nusantara Cemerlang

Abstract

PT Joyci Nusantara Cemerlang is a company engaged in the food industry, specifically in the production of dry cookies. In its production process, employees play an important role in maintaining product quality and ensuring smooth operations. However, based on pre-survey results and interviews, it was found that the compensation received by employees did not fully meet the Bandung Regency Minimum Wage Standard, along with a decline in performance in several aspects. This study aims to analyze the effect of compensation on employee performance. The research method used is a qualitative approach quantified into quantitative data. Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 50 respondents and analyzed using descriptive analysis, simple linear regression test, correlation coefficient, determination, and t-test. The results show that compensation falls into the “Fair” category with an average score of 3.02, while employee performance is also in the “Fair” category with an average score of 3.19. Partially, compensation has an effect on employee performance with a t-value of 4.537 > t-table value of 1.677 and a significance level of 0.000. The coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.300 indicates that compensation contributes 30% to employee performance, while the remaining 70% is influenced by other factors not examined in this study.

References

Armstrong, M. (2020). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management (16th ed.). Pearson.

Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2019). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Bumi Aksara.

Karim, A. (2024). Human resource management.

Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P. (2017). Manajemen sumber daya manusia perusahaan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2018). Human resource management (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Moniruzzaman Sarker, & Al-Muaalemi, M. A. (2022). Sampling techniques for quantitative research. In M. R. Islam, N. A. Khan, & R. Baikady (Eds.), Principles of social research methodology (pp. 221–234). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_15

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson.

Seeling, M. X., Kreuter, T., Scavarda, L. F., Thomé, A. M. T., & Hellingrath, B. (2021). Global sales and operations planning: A multinational manufacturing company perspective. PLOS ONE, 16(9), e0257572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257572

Sinambela, L. P. (2021). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Bumi Aksara.

Uche, I. B., & Uche, O. A. (2025). “Our work is shaped by culture”: Understanding social work practice in Nigeria through the influence of local traditions and norms. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2025.2533381

Wæraas, A., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2012). Public sector organisations and reputation management: Five problems (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2384874). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2384874