AI AS A PEDAGOGICAL COMPANION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: TRANSFORMING TEACHING AND LEARNING PRACTICES IN THE ERA OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Authors

  • Ratna Deli Sari Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP
  • Dadi Priadi Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP
  • Sonya Meylani Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61397/mfc.v4i1.574

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, AI learning companion, higher education, collaborative learning, personal-ized learning, student autonomy, human-centered AI

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how artificial intelligence (AI) functions as a learning companion in transforming learning and teaching practices in a higher education setting. The study employed a qualitative approach using a dual-case study design, conducted in two classes in the Education Study Program at Sangga Buana YPKP University in Bandung. The participants consisted of 50 individuals, including 10 faculty members and 40 students who had direct experience with AI-based learning. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, non-participant observation of AI-assisted learning activities, and document analysis covering course syllabi, learning materials, assessment guidelines, AI usage policies, and student assignment artifacts. The data were analyzed using reflective thematic analysis, combining deductive and inductive approaches, and were strengthened through source triangulation, participant validation, peer discussion, audit trails, and researcher reflexivity. The results of the study indicate that AI serves as a learning companion that expands access to explanations, provides rapid feedback, supports the exploration of ideas, and facilitates personalized learning. The integration of AI also transforms the role of instructors from knowledge transmitters to facilitators, designers of learning experiences, evaluators of information, and mediators of critical AI use. At the same time, students demonstrate increased opportunities to develop autonomy, self-regulation, and reflection on the learning process. However, the effectiveness of human–AI collaboration is significantly influenced by AI literacy, trust, transparency, information accuracy, academic integrity, data privacy, and human oversight mechanisms. The research concludes that AI is most productive when positioned as a pedagogical partner that enhances human capabilities, rather than as a substitute for instructors or students.

References

Albadarin, Y., Saqr, M., Pope, N., & Tukiainen, M. (2024). A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education. Discover Education, 3, 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00138-2

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Batista, J., Mesquita, A., & Carnaz, G. (2024). Generative AI and higher education: Trends, challenges, and future directions from a systematic literature review. Information, 15(11), 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15110676

Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. K. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1206936. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936

Farrelly, T., & Baker, N. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: Implications and considerations for higher education practice. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111109

Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A.-T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive learning using artificial intelligence in e-learning: A literature review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121216

Katiyar, N., Awasthi, V. K., Pratap, R., Mishra, K., Shukla, N., Singh, R., & Tiwari, M. (2024). AI-driven personalized learning systems: Enhancing educational effectiveness. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 11514–11524. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.4961

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, F., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Michalon, B., & Camacho-Zuñiga, C. (2023). ChatGPT, a brand-new tool to strengthen timeless competencies. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1251163. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1251163

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the implementation of ChatGPT in education: A systematic review. Computers, 12(8), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153

Ogunleye, B., Zakariyyah, K. I., Ajao, O., Olayinka, O., & Sharma, H. (2024). A systematic review of generative AI for teaching and learning practice. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09520

Qian, C. (2023). Research on human-centered design in college music education to improve student experience of artificial intelligence-based information systems. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 8(3), 23761. https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.13854

Qu, Y., Tan, M. X. Y., & Wang, J. (2024). Disciplinary differences in undergraduate students' engagement with generative artificial intelligence. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00341-6

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Sharples, M. (2023). Towards social generative AI for education: Theory, practices and ethics. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.10063

Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students' acceptance and use of ChatGPT in learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100190

Thüs, D., Malone, S., & Brünken, R. (2024). Exploring generative AI in higher education: A RAG system to enhance student engagement with scientific literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1474892. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1474892

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693

Wang, X., Liu, Q., Pang, H., Tan, S. C., Lei, J., Wallace, M. P., & Li, L. (2023). What matters in AI-supported learning? A study of human-AI interactions in language learning using cluster analysis and epistemic network analysis. Computers & Education, 194, 104703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104703

Wilkens, U., Lupp, D., & Langholf, V. (2023). Configurations of human-centered AI at work: Seven actor-structure engagements in organizations. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1272159. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1272159

Williams, R. T. (2023). The ethical implications of using generative chatbots in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1331607. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1331607

Wu, F., Dang, Y., & Li, M. (2025). A systematic review of responses, attitudes, and utilization behaviors on generative AI for teaching and learning in higher education. Behavioral Sciences, 15(4), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040467

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Sari, R. D., Priadi, D., & Meylani, S. (2026). AI AS A PEDAGOGICAL COMPANION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: TRANSFORMING TEACHING AND LEARNING PRACTICES IN THE ERA OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Multifinance, 4(1), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.61397/mfc.v4i1.574