ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS THROUGH THE PERSPECTIVE OF INTERNAL COMMUNICATION IN THE DIGITAL AGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61397/tla.v3i3.534Keywords:
Internal communication, Organizational behavior, Digital era, Innovation diffusion, Organizational cultureAbstract
This study aims to analyze organizational behavior through the perspective of internal communication in the digital age, highlighting how communication practices shape values, assumptions, and the adoption of technological innovations within organizations. The approach used is a systematic literature review, including a search for scientific articles in indexed databases (Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar) using keywords such as internal communication, digital transformation, organizational behavior, diffusion of innovations, and organizational culture. The selected literature is limited to peer-reviewed publications from 2014 to 2025, thus covering the latest developments in digital communication and organizational culture. The conceptual framework of the study integrates three main theories: Organizational Communication Theory (Heath & Bryant, 2000), the Diffusion of Innovations Model (Rogers, 2003), and Organizational Culture Theory (Edgar H. Schein, 2024). Through thematic analysis, the literature was extracted to identify the relationship between the quality of internal information flow (clarity, consistency, digital channels) and organizational behavior variables such as employee engagement, collaboration, loyalty, and innovation adoption rates. The synthetic results show that digitally integrated internal communication accelerates the process of innovation diffusion, strengthens shared cultural values, and increases participation and job satisfaction levels. Conversely, fragmented communication has the potential to cause resistance, conflict, and decreased productivity. This study contributes theoretically by expanding the understanding of the communicative role in organizational digital transformation, as well as practical implications for HR managers and change leaders to design communication strategies that balance information disclosure, message consistency, and cultural support to facilitate adaptive and innovative organizational behavior.
References
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
Edgar H. Schein. (2024). The artistry of a reflexive organizational scholar-practitioner. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003366355
Hargie, O. (2011). Skilled interpersonal communication: Research, theory and practice (5th ed.). Routledge.
Heath, R. L., & Bryant, J. (2000). Human communication theory: The evolution of a field of study. Routledge.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. M. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Technical Report EBSE Report 2007-01).
Kodrat, D. S., Tambunan, D. B., Hartono, W., Teng, P. K., & Ling, C. P. (2024). Comparative study of the impact of information literacy, digital literacy and media literacy on employability between Indonesia and Malaysia. Decision Science Letters, 13(4), 853–866. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2024.8.006
Liu, Y., & Tsai, C. (2021). Cultural orientation and innovation adoption in digital enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 134, 12–22.
Men, L. R. (2015). The internal communication role of the chief executive officer: Communication channels, style, and effectiveness. Public Relations Review, 41(4), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.06.021
Regina, A. L. V., & Munasinghe, M. A. T. K. (2022). The dilemma of information overload: A review of literature from accounting and finance related studies. South Asian Journal of Finance, 2(2), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.4038/sajf.v2i2.43
Riedl, E., & Verschuuren, P. (2025). A systematic literature review of esports integrity. International Sports Law Journal, 25(2), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-025-00295-y
Rogers, E. M. (2024). Diffusion of innovations. In Encyclopedia of Sport Management (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035317189.ch157
V, B., & V, C. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Wells, G., Shea, B., Robertson, J., Peterson, J., Welch, V., & Losos, M. (2012). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysis bias and confounding. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. http://www.evidencebasedpublichealth.de/download/Newcastle_Ottowa_Scale_Pope_Bruce.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Witri Cahyati, Sandra Irawaty, Widyapuri Prasastiningtyas, Renata Salsabilla Ramadhan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



